An editorial appeared in the New York Times on October 27 entitled Remember Renewable Energy?, which discussed the slow moving progress by Congress (since jumping on board in 2005) with wind, solar and other projects focused on producing 10,000 megawatts by 2015.
It would appear that some of the talk about the White House needing to support alternative energy did not fall on deaf ears since the Interior Secretary Ken Salazar has approved several solar power projects in recent weeks.
This is good news because we need to step up our efforts to keep up with Europe and China who are already investing heavily in wind and solar manufacturing.
Three things are cited in the editorial that need to happen in order for the U.S. to catch up:
- Generous subsidies or alternative funding for renewable energy projects so they can compete with fuels like coal, oil and natural gas.
- Faster approvals by agencies such as Minerals Management Service. Three to five years of negotiations is not acceptable. As the editorial says, “The bureaucracy now has to deliver.”
- The expanding and updating of the electrical grid to accommodate new energy sources is crucial to any success. That will require partnerships and the giving up of control.
What are your thoughts on the future of renewable energy?
Lucas Hamilton is Manager, Building Science Applications for CertainTeed Corporation